-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 13.9k
Separate private_intra_doc_links and broken_intra_doc_links into separate lints
#77249
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
3f20adb to
3fdad10
Compare
…separate lints This is not ideal because it means `deny(broken_intra_doc_links)` will no longer `deny(private_intra_doc_links)`. However, it can't be fixed with a new lint group, because `broken` is already in the `rustdoc` lint group; there would need to be a way to nest groups somehow. This also removes the early `return` so that the link will be generated even though it gives a warning.
3fdad10 to
51aab59
Compare
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 51aab59d93778d4afd5dbe01b8e901a2847b092c has been approved by |
|
Oh lol it tried to run the example as a doc-test. Let me try ignoring it. |
51aab59 to
80ffaed
Compare
|
@bors r=Manishearth |
|
📌 Commit 80ffaed has been approved by |
…as-schievink Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#76839 (Add asm! support for MIPS) - rust-lang#77203 (Check for missing const-stability attributes in `rustc_passes`) - rust-lang#77249 (Separate `private_intra_doc_links` and `broken_intra_doc_links` into separate lints) - rust-lang#77252 (reduce overlong line) - rust-lang#77256 (Fix typo in ExpnData documentation) - rust-lang#77262 (Remove duplicate comment) - rust-lang#77263 (Clean up trivial if let) Failed merges: r? `@ghost`
|
It seems it is not possible to |
Well that's odd. |
Recognize `private_intra_doc_links` as a lint Previously, trying to allow this would give another error! ``` warning: unknown lint: `private_intra_doc_links` --> private.rs:1:10 | 1 | #![allow(private_intra_doc_links)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `broken_intra_doc_links` | = note: `#[warn(unknown_lints)]` on by default warning: public documentation for `DocMe` links to private item `DontDocMe` --> private.rs:2:11 | 2 | /// docs [DontDocMe] | ^^^^^^^^^ this item is private | = note: `#[warn(private_intra_doc_links)]` on by default = note: this link will resolve properly if you pass `--document-private-items` ``` Fixes the issue found in rust-lang#77249 (comment). r? `@Manishearth` Does anyone know why this additional step is necessary? It seems weird this has to be declared in 3 different places.
Recognize `private_intra_doc_links` as a lint Previously, trying to allow this would give another error! ``` warning: unknown lint: `private_intra_doc_links` --> private.rs:1:10 | 1 | #![allow(private_intra_doc_links)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `broken_intra_doc_links` | = note: `#[warn(unknown_lints)]` on by default warning: public documentation for `DocMe` links to private item `DontDocMe` --> private.rs:2:11 | 2 | /// docs [DontDocMe] | ^^^^^^^^^ this item is private | = note: `#[warn(private_intra_doc_links)]` on by default = note: this link will resolve properly if you pass `--document-private-items` ``` Fixes the issue found in rust-lang#77249 (comment). r? ``@Manishearth`` Does anyone know why this additional step is necessary? It seems weird this has to be declared in 3 different places.
Recognize `private_intra_doc_links` as a lint Previously, trying to allow this would give another error! ``` warning: unknown lint: `private_intra_doc_links` --> private.rs:1:10 | 1 | #![allow(private_intra_doc_links)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `broken_intra_doc_links` | = note: `#[warn(unknown_lints)]` on by default warning: public documentation for `DocMe` links to private item `DontDocMe` --> private.rs:2:11 | 2 | /// docs [DontDocMe] | ^^^^^^^^^ this item is private | = note: `#[warn(private_intra_doc_links)]` on by default = note: this link will resolve properly if you pass `--document-private-items` ``` Fixes the issue found in rust-lang#77249 (comment). r? ```@Manishearth``` Does anyone know why this additional step is necessary? It seems weird this has to be declared in 3 different places.
Recognize `private_intra_doc_links` as a lint Previously, trying to allow this would give another error! ``` warning: unknown lint: `private_intra_doc_links` --> private.rs:1:10 | 1 | #![allow(private_intra_doc_links)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `broken_intra_doc_links` | = note: `#[warn(unknown_lints)]` on by default warning: public documentation for `DocMe` links to private item `DontDocMe` --> private.rs:2:11 | 2 | /// docs [DontDocMe] | ^^^^^^^^^ this item is private | = note: `#[warn(private_intra_doc_links)]` on by default = note: this link will resolve properly if you pass `--document-private-items` ``` Fixes the issue found in rust-lang#77249 (comment). r? ````@Manishearth```` Does anyone know why this additional step is necessary? It seems weird this has to be declared in 3 different places.
Recognize `private_intra_doc_links` as a lint Previously, trying to allow this would give another error! ``` warning: unknown lint: `private_intra_doc_links` --> private.rs:1:10 | 1 | #![allow(private_intra_doc_links)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `broken_intra_doc_links` | = note: `#[warn(unknown_lints)]` on by default warning: public documentation for `DocMe` links to private item `DontDocMe` --> private.rs:2:11 | 2 | /// docs [DontDocMe] | ^^^^^^^^^ this item is private | = note: `#[warn(private_intra_doc_links)]` on by default = note: this link will resolve properly if you pass `--document-private-items` ``` Fixes the issue found in rust-lang#77249 (comment). r? `````@Manishearth````` Does anyone know why this additional step is necessary? It seems weird this has to be declared in 3 different places.
Recognize `private_intra_doc_links` as a lint Previously, trying to allow this would give another error! ``` warning: unknown lint: `private_intra_doc_links` --> private.rs:1:10 | 1 | #![allow(private_intra_doc_links)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `broken_intra_doc_links` | = note: `#[warn(unknown_lints)]` on by default warning: public documentation for `DocMe` links to private item `DontDocMe` --> private.rs:2:11 | 2 | /// docs [DontDocMe] | ^^^^^^^^^ this item is private | = note: `#[warn(private_intra_doc_links)]` on by default = note: this link will resolve properly if you pass `--document-private-items` ``` Fixes the issue found in rust-lang#77249 (comment). r? ``````@Manishearth`````` Does anyone know why this additional step is necessary? It seems weird this has to be declared in 3 different places.
Recognize `private_intra_doc_links` as a lint Previously, trying to allow this would give another error! ``` warning: unknown lint: `private_intra_doc_links` --> private.rs:1:10 | 1 | #![allow(private_intra_doc_links)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `broken_intra_doc_links` | = note: `#[warn(unknown_lints)]` on by default warning: public documentation for `DocMe` links to private item `DontDocMe` --> private.rs:2:11 | 2 | /// docs [DontDocMe] | ^^^^^^^^^ this item is private | = note: `#[warn(private_intra_doc_links)]` on by default = note: this link will resolve properly if you pass `--document-private-items` ``` Fixes the issue found in rust-lang#77249 (comment). r? ```````@Manishearth``````` Does anyone know why this additional step is necessary? It seems weird this has to be declared in 3 different places.
Recognize `private_intra_doc_links` as a lint Previously, trying to allow this would give another error! ``` warning: unknown lint: `private_intra_doc_links` --> private.rs:1:10 | 1 | #![allow(private_intra_doc_links)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `broken_intra_doc_links` | = note: `#[warn(unknown_lints)]` on by default warning: public documentation for `DocMe` links to private item `DontDocMe` --> private.rs:2:11 | 2 | /// docs [DontDocMe] | ^^^^^^^^^ this item is private | = note: `#[warn(private_intra_doc_links)]` on by default = note: this link will resolve properly if you pass `--document-private-items` ``` Fixes the issue found in rust-lang#77249 (comment). r? ````````@Manishearth```````` Does anyone know why this additional step is necessary? It seems weird this has to be declared in 3 different places.
This is not ideal because it means
deny(broken_intra_doc_links)willno longer
deny(private_intra_doc_links). However, it can't be fixedwith a new lint group, because
brokenis already in therustdoclintgroup; there would need to be a way to nest groups somehow.
This also removes the early
returnso that the link will be generatedeven though it gives a warning.
r? @Manishearth
cc @ecstatic-morse (#77242 (comment))